Two found poem ideas for those who have a hard time coming up with their own words:
#1
Search Twitter for #spinepoems (without the kids watching) and you'll find a ton of great examples for an easy activity easily done either in the library or the classroom collection. Here's one I made:
Because call numbers...
the dreamer
the mailbox
CRASH
bounce
flipped
three times lucky
Glory be!
okay for now
a small white scar
#2
Blackout poems a la Austin Kleon. Librarian Jennifer Reed has a great article about using an old copy of a Harry Potter book with fifth graders to make blackout poems.
Search This Blog
Monday, March 24, 2014
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
Saturday, March 1, 2014
Some Thoughts On Copyright
One thing I've found recently is that there seems to be some confusion among my teachers and students as to the difference between plagiarism and copyright infringement. After attending Josh Mika's (Naperville #203) breakout session on Open Educational Resources, I thought I would try to clarify and provide some places for teachers and students to find material with looser permissions.
Plagiarism, as defined by plagiarism.org, is passing off someone else's words as your own or using someone else's material without crediting them. It's a form of fraud and theft. There are several different ways plagiarism is committed:
1. Pretending someone else's idea is yours.
2. Not citing a source.
3. Not putting a quotation in quotes and crediting the person who said it.
4. Not giving the right information about a source.
5. Changing a few words here and there, but leaving the essentials the same.
6. Overdoing the quoting. Using so many quotes, you may as well have photocopied the source.
Those examples of plagiarism may or may not violate copyright law depending on the material used and the restrictions placed on the original work.
Copyright is a legal protection offered by the federal government to original works. These days, you do not have to file for federal copyright to be protected, although it makes suing a lot easier if you're registered. Any original work is automatically protected under federal copyright law. But, you say, I'm a teacher! Don't I get fair use...so I can use anything I want as long as I'm not making money off of it?
Well, sort of. Fair use is a legal defense, not a law. So, basically, it comes into effect once you've been given a cease and desist letter or a subpoena. It's better to avoid both. Fair use has its basis in common practice in court. Out of that comes some general questions to ask about each creation you plan to use:
1. Is it for nonprofit educational use?
2. What are you using?
3. How much of it are you using?
4. Would it impact the market value?
If you feel any conscience twinges when asking yourself any one those four questions, get permission first. Better permission sooner than lawsuit later, is my opinion. Or find something in the public domain to substitute. If you have any concerns or questions about whether what you're using could be breaking the law (like showing Brave for indoor recess - bad idea), ask your friendly neighborhood librarian and she or he will be able to help you decide the best course of action.
Josh Mika has a wonderful wiki linking many OER sites as well as some digital books on how to incorporate ethical use of original works in your instruction and in student projects. Visit his wiki, Beyond4Walls and click on the DuKane link for wonderful resources.
Plagiarism, as defined by plagiarism.org, is passing off someone else's words as your own or using someone else's material without crediting them. It's a form of fraud and theft. There are several different ways plagiarism is committed:
1. Pretending someone else's idea is yours.
2. Not citing a source.
3. Not putting a quotation in quotes and crediting the person who said it.
4. Not giving the right information about a source.
5. Changing a few words here and there, but leaving the essentials the same.
6. Overdoing the quoting. Using so many quotes, you may as well have photocopied the source.
Those examples of plagiarism may or may not violate copyright law depending on the material used and the restrictions placed on the original work.
Copyright is a legal protection offered by the federal government to original works. These days, you do not have to file for federal copyright to be protected, although it makes suing a lot easier if you're registered. Any original work is automatically protected under federal copyright law. But, you say, I'm a teacher! Don't I get fair use...so I can use anything I want as long as I'm not making money off of it?
Well, sort of. Fair use is a legal defense, not a law. So, basically, it comes into effect once you've been given a cease and desist letter or a subpoena. It's better to avoid both. Fair use has its basis in common practice in court. Out of that comes some general questions to ask about each creation you plan to use:
1. Is it for nonprofit educational use?
2. What are you using?
3. How much of it are you using?
4. Would it impact the market value?
If you feel any conscience twinges when asking yourself any one those four questions, get permission first. Better permission sooner than lawsuit later, is my opinion. Or find something in the public domain to substitute. If you have any concerns or questions about whether what you're using could be breaking the law (like showing Brave for indoor recess - bad idea), ask your friendly neighborhood librarian and she or he will be able to help you decide the best course of action.
Josh Mika has a wonderful wiki linking many OER sites as well as some digital books on how to incorporate ethical use of original works in your instruction and in student projects. Visit his wiki, Beyond4Walls and click on the DuKane link for wonderful resources.
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
Why blog?
Focusing on reading and reviewing books off my #MustReadin2014 list instead of my main page has generated a list of draft posts that's rather startling to a fledgling blogger. So, I began to wonder, why have I become so enamored with blogging over the last few months? (The library blog 1.0 is on my district Google site.) What has blogging done for me, and what can it do for you?
1. Blogging focuses ideas.
With constant social media bombardment (self-inflicted), working with four buildings' worth of great staff and students, taking graduate classes, reading #kidlit and books for personal interest, and indulging in the occasional Netflix series binge, I need a focal point to help me filter out the nonessential. As I have an idea for a post, I create a draft and sort and sift new ideas into the appropriate post. That sorting and sifting helps me to bring together similar and disparate ideas.
2. Blogging improves synthesis.
See point #1. Now mush everything around, rest and let things connect. When I read and listen to information with the idea that I will likely use it or pass it along, I tend to see more connections than I would if I were just looking for the idee du jour. What is not directly applicable is easily forgettable. If I'm keeping my blogging options open, I'm more likely to try to find ways to fit new ideas together with each other or with older ideas. And synthesizing is one of the best ways to internalize new ideas.
3. Blogging promotes communication.
I know that sounds silly, because a blog is for communicating, but if you devote yourself to the care and feeding of a blog when you know someone may possibly read it, you tend to spend more effort on it. If you spend more effort, you want someone to read it, so you advertise it. If someone reads it, you've made a connection with someone (hopefully in a positive way). And ideally there's interaction so you have more ideas, more synthesis, and more communication, and everyone gets a little better in some way.
The biggest benefit to blogging for me, though, is it's rekindled my passion for my career. Blogging has provided a focus for my restless surfing, a way to organize my thoughts, and a forum for sharing them. I guess that's what I needed. So, interact. Comment on blogs, create a Twitter account, write your own blog (even if no one reads it), curate a Tumblr. It's worth the time invested.
1. Blogging focuses ideas.
With constant social media bombardment (self-inflicted), working with four buildings' worth of great staff and students, taking graduate classes, reading #kidlit and books for personal interest, and indulging in the occasional Netflix series binge, I need a focal point to help me filter out the nonessential. As I have an idea for a post, I create a draft and sort and sift new ideas into the appropriate post. That sorting and sifting helps me to bring together similar and disparate ideas.
2. Blogging improves synthesis.
See point #1. Now mush everything around, rest and let things connect. When I read and listen to information with the idea that I will likely use it or pass it along, I tend to see more connections than I would if I were just looking for the idee du jour. What is not directly applicable is easily forgettable. If I'm keeping my blogging options open, I'm more likely to try to find ways to fit new ideas together with each other or with older ideas. And synthesizing is one of the best ways to internalize new ideas.
3. Blogging promotes communication.
I know that sounds silly, because a blog is for communicating, but if you devote yourself to the care and feeding of a blog when you know someone may possibly read it, you tend to spend more effort on it. If you spend more effort, you want someone to read it, so you advertise it. If someone reads it, you've made a connection with someone (hopefully in a positive way). And ideally there's interaction so you have more ideas, more synthesis, and more communication, and everyone gets a little better in some way.
The biggest benefit to blogging for me, though, is it's rekindled my passion for my career. Blogging has provided a focus for my restless surfing, a way to organize my thoughts, and a forum for sharing them. I guess that's what I needed. So, interact. Comment on blogs, create a Twitter account, write your own blog (even if no one reads it), curate a Tumblr. It's worth the time invested.
Monday, January 27, 2014
And the Winner Is...
Today the 2014 American Library Association Youth Media Awards were announced, and as always are a fantastic list of deserving authors and illustrators. While I'm a little late with this, I'm using the ALAYMAs to launch my list of #MustReadin2014 books. (Because apparently the excitement generated by the announcement keeps overloading the ALA website, I'm linking the list from the CBC website here. Also take a look at the Horn Book reviews.) Congrats, too, to Brian Selznick for being announced as this year's Arbuthnot lecturer. I've included links to the author/illustrator websites. Please visit them, and buy from your local indy book store.
My favorites off the list this year are (out of the ones I've read so far)...drumroll please...
Journey by Aaron Becker (Caldecott Honor recipient)
Locomotive by Brian Floca (Caldecott Medal and Sibert Honor recipient)
Nelson Mandela by Kadir Nelson (Scott King Honor for illustrator recipient)
The Watermelon Seed by Greg Pizzoli (Geisel Award recipient)
Mr. Wuffles by David Wiesner (Caldecott Honor recipient)
And the book that gave me chills and a major brain worm:
Doll Bones by Holly Black (Newberry Honor recipient)
My favorites off the list this year are (out of the ones I've read so far)...drumroll please...
Journey by Aaron Becker (Caldecott Honor recipient)
Locomotive by Brian Floca (Caldecott Medal and Sibert Honor recipient)
Nelson Mandela by Kadir Nelson (Scott King Honor for illustrator recipient)
The Watermelon Seed by Greg Pizzoli (Geisel Award recipient)
Mr. Wuffles by David Wiesner (Caldecott Honor recipient)
And the book that gave me chills and a major brain worm:
Doll Bones by Holly Black (Newberry Honor recipient)
Monday, January 20, 2014
Productive Failure
There has been a lot of buzz about teaching failure in education lately, so I'm sure you've thought about how to incorporate failure into your instruction. Not all types of failure, however, are useful for growth. So, how do you incorporate productive failure into your instruction?
Outcome failure is simple to evaluate; the end result fails. Put in education terms, the student fails to complete the task properly or demonstrate understanding in an assessment. Process failure can be more difficult to assess. In process failure, the outcome may be achieved, but the way the student got there is flawed in some way. To assess process failure or success, the teacher must evaluate not just the end result, but the steps along the way. In order to have both outcome and process success, the student must go through an iterative and reflective process.
Iteration is a term used in many design fields, and it means simply (in my words) to try, fail, fix, repeat. After watching the music video by OK Go, 7 year old Audri was inspired to create his own Rube Goldberg machine and documented his failures and success.
Manu Kapur's research on productive failure shows that, when guided, students are able to demonstrate understanding of difficult concepts better than students who were either allowed to fail with no guidance, or students that were in a more controlled environment. The process of learning productive failure builds stamina, perseverance, analysis, critical thinking and creativity; skills that are difficult if not impossible to teach, but must be instilled and nurtured. In the Choice Literacy article linked by the principals this month, the author reinforces the idea that research is a great arena for students to experience productive failure. As students go through an iterative process like research or making a Rube Goldberg machine, have them document their process along the way and reflect on it. If you need ideas about how to incorporate reflection into an iterative assignment, take a look at this article from School Library Monthly.
Sunday, January 12, 2014
Chatterpix: Fun Little Add-on Element
As an add-on to a biography unit, a third grade student created a 30 second summary of her famous person. (And apparently, Jacques Cartier wasn't the most honest person.)
As a product, it's a slender demonstration of knowledge for intermediate students, but as a puzzle piece to a larger product it has some fun possibilities. And for younger students, it's a great way to show a snippet of their own work with their voice narrating to work on oral presentation skills. If I were going to take this app further with the third grade product, I'd take the written report, the hand drawn poster of the person, the Chatterpix, and combine those into a more polished product.
With those three pieces (student art, written report, and Chatterpix), students can start creating something a little more interesting. Keep the traditional report and the hand drawn work. Take a picture of the art and use Aurasma, Layar or Glogster as the vessel for making an interactive experience for other students and parents. Instead of making one long recording of the report, have the student rewrite the report in first person from the subject's perspective, and record a different Chatterpix for each subtopic. Embed each Chatterpix in a different area of the photograph of the hand drawn art using an augmented reality app or Glogster. House them on the class blog, and have the students investigate each others' reports. Or, even better, have classmates read the report and create Chatterpix based on what they've learned from their classmates.
It sounds complicated, but if you start with a small project and teach them Chatterpix by itself (and the same with the other tech tool), it's much easier to teach them to integrate these different tools with an academic concept.
With those three pieces (student art, written report, and Chatterpix), students can start creating something a little more interesting. Keep the traditional report and the hand drawn work. Take a picture of the art and use Aurasma, Layar or Glogster as the vessel for making an interactive experience for other students and parents. Instead of making one long recording of the report, have the student rewrite the report in first person from the subject's perspective, and record a different Chatterpix for each subtopic. Embed each Chatterpix in a different area of the photograph of the hand drawn art using an augmented reality app or Glogster. House them on the class blog, and have the students investigate each others' reports. Or, even better, have classmates read the report and create Chatterpix based on what they've learned from their classmates.
It sounds complicated, but if you start with a small project and teach them Chatterpix by itself (and the same with the other tech tool), it's much easier to teach them to integrate these different tools with an academic concept.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







